Skip to search.

Barry Stone: The Inspector is in the House

Barry Stone
My Yahoo RSS

Homeowner faces dilemma after water well discovery

by Barry Stone Tue, Jan 17, 2012
Provided byInman News
8
2
Sign In
to Rate & Comment
In many cases, expensive sealing, replumbing can be avoided

DEAR BARRY: The plumbing for my house is connected to the municipal water system, but there is an old artesian well in the basement that is pumped to a hose faucet in the yard.

When I bought the property two years ago, neither my real estate agent nor the home inspector said anything about the well being a problem. One year later, the city water department sent an inspector to check our water system. He informed us that a well within city limits was against code and had been for 10 years. We are now faced with a $3,000 bill to have the well sealed and the outside faucet replumbed.

My question is: Does the real estate company or the home inspector have any liability for selling a home that does not conform to city code? --Theresa

DEAR THERESA: A home inspector would not be aware of ordinances that involve wells because well systems are not within the scope of a home inspection.

Whether a Realtor would know about a well ordinance is uncertain. However, an agent who is competent and professional would recommend inspection of a well by a licensed well contractor. A well contractor would certainly know about such ordinances.

Another consideration is the seller's disclosure statement. It would be helpful to know if the sellers were ever informed that the well is not legal, but it may not be possible to determine the answer to that question.

The most important question, however, is whether the well is older than the ordinance. In all likelihood, it is. If so, enforcement of the newer requirement may not be legal. You should consult an attorney for the answer to this question. A letter from an attorney to the city may resolve the entire matter.

DEAR BARRY: My home inspector reported a problem with a gas water heater, but the seller's plumber disagrees with the inspector. The water heater is installed in a utility closet. It is directly in front of the forced-air furnace. The inspector says the work space in front of the furnace is restricted, but the plumber says that the location of the water heater does not violate any provision of the plumbing code. If this is a problem, I want it to be repaired. Who is correct: the inspector or the plumber? --Sherry

DEAR SHERRY: Both are correct, but the home inspector is more correct. The plumber is correct because the location of the water heater does not violate the plumbing code. The problem, however, involves a violation of the mechanical code, governing the installation of the forced-air furnace, not the water heater.

A minimum work space of 30 inches is required in front of the furnace. If the water heater is installed within that work space, it should be moved so that contractors, the gas company and other professionals can service the equipment.

Moving the water heater will entail modification and adjustment of the water, fuel and exhaust connections, and this could be costly, depending on how far the fixture must be moved.

To write to Barry Stone, please visit him on the Web at www.housedetective.com .

Contact Barry Stone: Email Letter to the Editor

Copyright 2012 Barry Stone

Reader Comments
Overall Article Rating:
8
2
Bassmaster
Article Rating:
I ran into the same problem in Colorado with a septic tank. They said it was illegal, but I won that battle because it was Grandfathered in. This well could be considered being Grandfathered in since it was installed before the law was passed.
voice.of.god
Article Rating:
The great majority of homes built more than ten years ago do not conform to current building codes. Ifcurrent codes are to be enforced in this manner against old buildings then most of ther USA would have to be shut down. This is strictly a Naziesque building code enforcement. This kind of thing is gradually making affordable housing impossible, and illegal.
Steven
Article Rating:
Michelle- the artesian well is only connected to a yard faucet so there would be no cross-connection. The well should be grandfathered and you should not lose this as an artesian well in the yard could save the day for you and your neighbors if power/water fail in a disaster as artesian wells provide water without needing a pump.
Jenny
Article Rating:
To confirm to code all that is required is to isolaye the well from city water. It can still be used for watering the lawn, washing the car, anything that does not put the water in the city sewage, that is quite different than rain water drainage systems,
Bobby
Article Rating:
about as dumb as lee county charging us to use our debit cards to pay for our tags and taxes,double taxation any way they look at it. my bank said they don't charge them for using our cards BAD POLICY!!!!!!
Related Yahoo! Services:
Personal Financial Advice
Some Yahoo! Real Estate information is provided by our trusted partners.
However, Yahoo! does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any third party content.
| Yahoo!-Zillow Real Estate Network